On 14 April 2015 at 17:33, leam hall <leamh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Working on a project that's importing code from an older project. There are > 2-3 dozen small bits and we're trying to add some functionality and clean up > the code in each small bit. Would it make sense to make each small bit it's > own branch? The theory is that as each branch becomes workable it gets > merged into master. That way no user pulls code that doesn't work and gets a > bad impression of the project.
That sound like a perfectly workable strategy. The only thing to decide is if you are going to merge the branches before push, or rebase them. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
