Well, the checked file was same, the line endings in the file was same 
(unix).

I haven't check the permissions, but the only thing I can suppose, that 
permissions or owner was different.
One was on Debian server.
Other was unpacked from a backup from same server, but unpack was done to a 
Windows 7 computer with NTFS filesystem, and from this place I added to git.

So I suppose the permission was different when locally added from Windows, 
from the case when pulled directly from server.


Thanks,
Konrad



2015. május 16., szombat 17:00:23 UTC+2 időpontban Philip Oakley a 
következőt írta:
>
>  
> Konrad,
>  
> Thanks for the report confirming how you solved it.
>  
> For others, the SO post notes:
> "I had a git (Add/Add) conflict. The information from Janos provided the 
> insight needed for a solution. The files "appeared" identical, but my 
> conflicting folder of files were added with a permission of 664 on one 
> branch, and a permission of 755 on another branch. Using *git status* 
> revealed 
> the difference between the files."
>  
> Were you able to confirm that it was a similar mode change problem? I note 
> that your 'git status' (in the original post) didn't give the mode change, 
> while the post suggests it would.
>  
> Philip
>
>   
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> *From:* Konrád Lőrinczi 
> *To:* git-...@googlegroups.com 
> *Cc:* philip...@iee.org ; klor...@gmail.com 
> *Sent:* Saturday, May 16, 2015 3:42 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [git-users] Merge conflict error, when there was no change 
> in mentioned file
>
> Finally solved the problem, based on solution used in following thread:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19475387/how-to-handle-fix-git-add-add-conflicts/20626817#20626817
>
> # Deleted all files from the local workdir.
>
> rm -rfv myconflictedfolder
>
>
> # commit this change
>
> git commit -m 'Resolve git Add/Add branch merge conflict by deleting 
> conflicted folder and files in myconflictedfolder'
>
>
> # do merge from remote 
>
> git pull origin master
>
>
> Pull was executed successfully.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Konrad
>
>
> 2015. május 16., szombat 14:37:28 UTC+2 időpontban Philip Oakley a 
> következőt írta: 
>>
>>  
>> *From:* Konrád Lőrinczi 
>>
>> *To:* git-...@googlegroups.com 
>> *Sent:* Saturday, May 16, 2015 1:03 PM
>> *Subject:* [git-users] Merge conflict error, when there was no change in 
>> mentioned file
>>
>> I have a site local repo and a remote repo.
>> Local repo contains the 1-2 month old content of remote repo.
>>
>>
>> I try to pull the whole content into local repo.
>>
>>      git pull origin master
>>     From ssh://.../site.git
>>      * branch            master     -> FETCH_HEAD
>>     ...
>>     CONFLICT (add/add): Merge conflict in admin/process_email.php
>>     Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
>>
>>
>>
>> I checked process_email.php using P4Merge, but shows no conflict, 
>> furthermore there were no changes at all, no difference.
>>
>>
>> I get 
>>
>>      $ git status
>>     On branch master
>>     nothing to commit, working directory clean on both repos. 
>>
>>
>>
>> Also I tried 
>>
>>      $ git pull -X theirs origin/master master
>>
>>
>> But still get the same error.
>>
>> I want to merge the remote origin repo with my local repo.
>> I want to overwite local repo with remote origin repo content as the 
>> remote repo is newer, contains the latest code.
>>
>> More than 2000 files are conflicting, while I checked the conflict and 
>> they have the same content. I would not want to do manual conflict 
>> handling. 
>>
>> I have 
>>  autocrlf = False
>> in the .gitconfig.
>>
>>
>> Why do I get conflict error for files, which have exactly the same 
>> content?
>>
>> Konrad,
>>  
>> An easy way to see what is going on is to split the 'git pull' into 'git 
>> fetch' (*) and then 'git merge' (*).
>>  
>> You may need extra options on the fetch and merge depending on your 
>> version to select the branches you want from the remote server into your 
>> remote-tracking branches (rtb) for that server.  
>>  
>> This separates out the issues and once you have all the remote changes 
>> held locally in your rtb's you can more easily do diffs between the two 
>> branches.
>>  
>> It can be quite a mind-wrench when you grok that rtb's are just local 
>> branches with a convenient name, rather than someting special that's to be 
>> 'feared'.
>>  
>> You may find that there are 'end of line' differences between the commits 
>> in the server, and the commits you have locally, which after eol 
>> conversion, look identical, but the different eol strings makes the sha1's 
>> different.
>>  
>> --
>>  
>> Philip
>>  
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Git for human beings" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to git-users+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to