On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 11:28:23 -0700
Michael <keybou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thank you Konstantin and Gergely!
> > Very informative reading. I'll try to keep my tree sorted out in
> > the future. :-)
> Having gone through the same issue myself multiple times before
> figuring out what was going on, perhaps this should be highlighted in
> a "Beginner's guide to common mistakes and how to avoid them" doc for
Oddly enough, this was never even remotely a problem for me.
I have started with VSS, then used CVS and, quite extensively,
Subversion, then had a cursory look at Hg and finally settled on Git.
(After that I also seriously dabbled with Fossil which I think is an
excellent DVCS, if not exactly "mine" in some of its design choices).
I mean, all the systems I mentioned do not consider the work tree to be
tied to a particular branch. _Based_ on a branch (or on a commit, or
on a mixture of them -- as it's possible in Subversion) but not somehow
tied to it.
Hence my question is: have you folks had used some [D]VCS which did
what you expected Git to do with regard to local changes?
I have just checked Hg's docs and they say that even with its different
branching model, you still can switch branches in a particular clone
using the `hg update -c` command, and it appears to behave similar to
`git checkout`: it won't somehow "stash" your uncommitted changes but
will rather refuse to proceed unless you pass it the "-C" command-line
options letting it get rid of your uncommitted changes first.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.