I have two directories. The one called bitbucket/source contains the cloned repository which was set up by another developer and the other one is called bitbucket/sourcecode which contains the same from my localhost so some of the files in there have been modified due to code changes. So now supposedly I create a branch and add those files from bitbucket/sourecode. A ridiculous amount of work. I'm going to be spending 80% of my time on overhead now that we have this new source control requirement.
On Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 5:53:19 PM UTC-6, Paul Smith wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 16:12 -0700, bestbrightes...@gmail.com <javascript:> > wrote: > > ok, looks like I did everything correctly except that I switched > directories before i did the git checkout -b branch1 command so I will see > what happens next -- i guess i need to specify some files for the new > branch (as for item 2. I used SSH). > > > Again, you haven't provided any information about EXACTLY what you did. > Which directory did you switch to? > > You can run "git status" from any directory within the workspace; by > default it shows the status of the entire workspace. > > I don't know what you mean by "specify some files for the new branch". A > branch starts at the same commit where the branch was created, so you have > all the same content on the branch as you had before you created the > branch. Until you change something of course. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
