In general, No. It's contrary to the basic Git VCS view. it's the content that matters not some 'irrelevant' metadata. https://confluence.atlassian.com/bbkb/preserving-file-timestamps-with-git-and-mercurial-781386524.html
There's a rant by Linus somewhere on that... https://web.archive.org/web/20120518150852/http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2007/3/5/240536 Sorry. ----- Original Message ----- From: winserver2...@gmail.com To: Git for human beings Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 10:31 PM Subject: [git-users] Keeping Timestamps Hi, Is there an option or version of GIT with a database that keeps the last file stamp of committed files?? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
