I'm learning GIT and I understand GIT uses pointers to track snapshots and it's easier to find the common ancestor of two files. Whereas, subversion has to resort to property svn:mergeinfo.
I know when I merge in svn, svn will add mergeinfo to the folder for me to commit. If I don't let svn record mergeinfo, how suck will it be? Is there a scenario where SVN has merge conflict while GIT merges succefully? Can the scenario not involve a file renaming? I'm pretty sure SVN cannot track renaming properly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
