> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 07:54:17PM +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote: > [...]
> If you're talking about
> hg commit --interactive
> which was previously available as an extension called "record", then yes,
> it appears to be roughly the same thing.
Right.
> The difference appears in that Git "exposes" that area which holds the state
> of the commit being prepared.
There is only one confusion left (I will use HTML in this mail, in order
to display better the following table).
| HG | Git | comment |
|----------+-----------------------+----------------------------------------|
| hg ci | git ci -a | commit all changes at once |
|----------+-----------------------+----------------------------------------|
| hg ci -i | git ci (?) | commit interactive some-or-all-changes |
| | or git add -i git ci | |
| | or git -i | |
While the first row is clear, the second is not clear to me.
And I think this is why users are from time to time confused. Once
understood maybe it is best to have an alias
1. for the interactive commit
2. and one for the commit all changes
Regards
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/git-users/87h7dj6cjz.fsf%40mat.ucm.es.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
