On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 13:37 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > One option for optimising this, if we really need to, might be to track
> > the file back to its _first_ ancestor and use that as an identification.
> > The SCM could store that identifier in the blob itself, or we could
> > consider it an 'inode number' and store it in git's tree objects.
> This suggestion (and this whole discussion about renames) has issues
> with file copies, which form a branch in the revision history. If I
> copy foo.c to foo2.c (or fs/ext2/ to fs/ext3/), then the oldest ancestor
> isn't a "unique inode number".
That's why I prefer the option of simply annotating the moves. They
don't need to be just renames -- it can cover the cases where files are
split up or merged into one, to indicate where the history of the given
_data_ is coming from.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html