Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 10:13:21PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > 
> > So, I assume that you don't want to merge my "SCM layer" (which is
> > perfectly fine by me). However, I also apply plenty of patches
> > concerning the "core git" - be it portability, leak fixes, argument
> > parsing fixes and so on.
> I'm actually perfectly happy to merge your SCM layer too eventually, but 
> I'm nervous at this point.  Especially while people are discussing some 
> SCM options that I'm personally very leery of, and think that may make 
> sense for others, but that I personally distrust.

You mean the renames tracking and similar yet mostly theoretical
discussions? Or do you dislike something already implemented? I'd be
happy to hear about it in that case. (To argue about it and likely get
persuaded... ;-)

But otherwise it is great news to me. Actually, in that case, is it
worth renaming it to Cogito and using cg to invoke it? Wouldn't be that
actually more confusing after it gets merged? IOW, should I stick to
"git" or feel free to rename it to "cg"?

                                Petr "Pasky" Baudis
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to