Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:45:02AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> >>>>> "PB" == Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PB> I'm wondering if doing
> PB> if [ "$(show-diff)" ]; then
> PB>   git diff | git apply
> PB> else
> PB>   checkout-cache -f -a
> PB> fi
> PB> would actually buy us some time; or, how common is it for people to have
> PB> no local changes whatsoever, and whether relative slowdown of additional
> PB> show-diff to git diff would actually matter.
> "show-diff -s" perhaps.  Also wouldn't it be faster to pipe
> show-diff output (not git diff output) to patch (not git apply)?

Excellent idea, thanks. Changed git merge to do this.

                                Petr "Pasky" Baudis
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to