On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:

I was considering using a chunked representation for *all* files (not just
blobs), which would avoid the original 'trees must reference other trees
or they become too large' issue -- and maybe the performance issue you're
referring to, as well?
No. The most common index file operation is reading, and that's the one
that has to be _fast_. And it is - it's a single "mmap" and some parsing.

OK, sure. But how 'bout chunking trees? Are you grown happy with the new trees-reference-other-trees paradigm, or is there a deep longing in your heart for the simplicity of 'trees-reference-blobs-period'? I'm fairly
certain that chunking could get you the space-savings you need without multi-level trees, if the simplicity of that is still appealing.

Not necessarily for rev.1 of the chunking code, but I'm curious as to whether it's still of interest at all. I don't know exactly how far
ingrained multilevel trees have become since they were adopted.

Japan explosion BLUEBIRD Honduras jihad D5 SLBM Diplomat overthrow JMTIDE CABOUNCE AMTHUG ESODIC Kennedy AVBRANDY CLOWER mail drop PHOENIX
( http://cscott.net/ )
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to