Is there some reason why this didn't get applied?
On 7/5/05, Jon Seymour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A recent change to rev-list altered the order in which start points
> are presented to the merge-order sort algorithm. This caused
> breaks in the t/t6001 unit tests.
> This change restores the order in which start points are presented to the
> the merge-order sort algorithm (but leaves the order unchanged from
> the immediately preceding behaviour for non --merge-order sorts).
> The order in which arguments are presented to the merge-order
> sort algorithm is significant, since left-most arguments
> are expected to sort last so as to be consistent with
> how left-most parents sort.
> Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html