Thomas Gummerer <[email protected]> writes:
> Replace strlen(ce->name) with ce_namelen() in a couple
> of places which gives us some additional bits of
> performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <[email protected]>
Very sensible, with or without the previous patch.
I am kind of surprised that we are very good and have only these
three places that had these unnecessary pessimization.
> ---
> read-cache.c | 4 ++--
> unpack-trees.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
> index ea75c89..a77877a 100644
> --- a/read-cache.c
> +++ b/read-cache.c
> @@ -1124,7 +1124,7 @@ int refresh_index(struct index_state *istate, unsigned
> int flags, const char **p
> continue;
>
> if (pathspec &&
> - !match_pathspec(pathspec, ce->name, strlen(ce->name), 0,
> seen))
> + !match_pathspec(pathspec, ce->name, ce_namelen(ce), 0,
> seen))
> filtered = 1;
>
> if (ce_stage(ce)) {
> @@ -1852,7 +1852,7 @@ int read_index_unmerged(struct index_state *istate)
> if (!ce_stage(ce))
> continue;
> unmerged = 1;
> - len = strlen(ce->name);
> + len = ce_namelen(ce);
> size = cache_entry_size(len);
> new_ce = xcalloc(1, size);
> memcpy(new_ce->name, ce->name, len);
> diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c
> index 9981dd3..abd0988 100644
> --- a/unpack-trees.c
> +++ b/unpack-trees.c
> @@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ static int verify_clean_subdirectory(struct cache_entry
> *ce,
> * First let's make sure we do not have a local modification
> * in that directory.
> */
> - namelen = strlen(ce->name);
> + namelen = ce_namelen(ce);
> for (i = locate_in_src_index(ce, o);
> i < o->src_index->cache_nr;
> i++) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html