Max Horn <> writes:

>> would it be feasible for the purpose of
>> the check to tweak the definition of "works" used in the loop so that
>> it considers the warning as "not working"?
> That would be possible, and probably a good idea. But it is also
> completely orthogonal to my patch. Indeed, if done without my
> patch,...

No, I was suggesting it as a possible way to make the addition of ""
order independent (which you said is impossible in your initial

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to