Hi, Ramsay Jones wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Observing that all well-written test scripts we have begin with this >> boilerplate line: >> >> test_expect_success setup ' >> >> I wouldn't mind introducing a new helper function test_setup that >> behaves like test_expect_success but is meant to be used in the >> first "set-up" phase of the tests in a test script. Neat. This could be used for later set-up tests, too, perhaps with a long-term goal of making non set-up tests independent of each other (reorderable and skippable). [...] > [1] For example, what should/will happen if someone uses test_must_fail, > test_might_fail, etc., within the test_fixture script? Should they simply > be banned within a text_fixture? Why wouldn't they act just like they do in test_expect_success blocks? FWIW I find Junio's test_setup name more self-explanatory. What mnemonic should I be using to remember the _fixture name? Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
