On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 10:44:07PM -0700, Brandon Casey wrote:
>> Anyone else? :)
> Sorry to gang up on you. :)

Heh. :b

> I still think your 2/2 is worth doing independently, though. It is silly
> that git-prune will not mention pruned objects without "-v", but will
> mention temporary files. They should be in the same category.

As I mentioned in an earlier message, I think the original thinking
was that removing a temporary object should be an unusual occurrence
that indicates a failure of some sort, so you want to inform the user
who may want to investigate (of course the file's gone, so what's to
investigate).  Removing a stale object file on the other hand is just
part of the normal operation.  That is why the former is always
printed out and the latter only when -v is used.

That was the original thinking, but I don't think it matters very
much.  Printing both using the same conditions seems valid.  My commit
message should be scrapped and replaced with something like your
paragraph though..

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to