Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbe...@gmail.com> writes: > By the way, I can see the usefulness of --reverse when giving a range, > but I think it's a little confusing when not giving a range.
"git rev-list --reverse --root v1.0.0" is a way to say "give me a list of commits to be replayed in sequence" without having a bottom, no? Ah, you mean when we do _not_ walk. Yeah, that is why I said that when we do not walk, we should not even call into prepare_revision_walk() in the first place in my earlier message. We should take the commits as given from the revs->pending.objects list instead. With your "no_walk = NO_WALK_UNSORTED", calling prepare_revision_walk() would amont to the same thing, as you would not sort the commits and use them as given by the user. > So "git cherry-pick A B" will apply B first, then A. I am confused a bit. Are you describing a buggy behaviour in the current codebase, or are you saying we should fix it to behave that way? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html