Brian Gernhardt <> writes:

> I wonder if there is something non-portable about the bibtex
> filter?  (The HTML filter as well, since that errors on my machine
> too.)

Yeah, that I didn't think of, but is a possibility (part of (1)

The HTML one is "[^<>= \t]+" and
the Bibtex one is "[={}\"]|[^={}\" \t]+"

and both will be used with "|[^[:space:]]|[\xc0-\xff][\x80-\xbf]+"
appended and given to regcomp with REG_EXTENDED|REG_NEWLINE.  

Nothing jumps at me that is common to these two but not shared by
other patterns.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to