Thomas Rast <tr...@student.ethz.ch> writes:
> Well, yeah, you snipped this part from my original post :-)
> } Even if this turns out to be flawed, we should also identify uses of
> } in_merge_bases() where the real question was is_descendant_of() [I
> } somewhat suspect that's all of them], and then replace is_descendant_of
> } with a much cheaper lookup. This can be as simple as propagating a mark
> } from the candidate until it either goes beyond all possible ancestors,
> } or hits one of them.
Yeah, I agree with the above, and the "cheaper lookup" would
probably be merge-bases-many() without postprocess.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html