On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:53 PM, W. Trevor King <wk...@tremily.us> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:58:37PM +0200, Johan Herland wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:48 PM, W. Trevor King <wk...@tremily.us> wrote:
>> > If I'm missing a good reason to keep everything under
>> > 'refs/notes/', feel free to ignore the second patch.
>> This has been discussed a couple of times on this list, but it never
>> resulted in any actual changes. Read up on this thread to get some
> Thanks for the pointer, it looks like there are a bunch of good ideas.
> I assume the lack of changes was due to nobody having the
> time/inclination to implement
Yes, I think time/inclination probably has a lot to do with it. Also,
I forgot to link to the largest mailing list thread that discusses
these changes in _much_ more detail:
As you can see, the discussion quickly balloons into something much
larger than a simple discussion of where remote notes should be
That said, your patch 2/2 might be an acceptable stopgap measure for
the time being, and then we can reevaluate it if/when we implement a
larger ref restructuring.
Johan Herland, <jo...@herland.net>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html