On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 03:23:31PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> >> Yeah, I agree with the reasoning.  This is an unessential feature
> >> that is with the problem for a long time, so let's go the route #1
> >> first before we do anything else.
> >
> > OK. I think Conrad's patch takes us most of the way there. I had a few
> > minor comments, but I think another round should do it. Conrad?
> I'd rather want to see a patch that _only_ documents the current
> behaviour to unconfuse people first.  I definitely do not want any
> patch that changes the command line parsing or any other behaviour
> change with problems that have to take time from reviewers to point
> them out mixed in it.

Sorry, I should have been more clear. I want to see a re-roll of only
the documentation bits of Conrad's patch, for which I had only minor
comments. The code part had major problems. :)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to