On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 03:23:31PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Yeah, I agree with the reasoning. This is an unessential feature > >> that is with the problem for a long time, so let's go the route #1 > >> first before we do anything else. > > > > OK. I think Conrad's patch takes us most of the way there. I had a few > > minor comments, but I think another round should do it. Conrad? > > I'd rather want to see a patch that _only_ documents the current > behaviour to unconfuse people first. I definitely do not want any > patch that changes the command line parsing or any other behaviour > change with problems that have to take time from reviewers to point > them out mixed in it.
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I want to see a re-roll of only the documentation bits of Conrad's patch, for which I had only minor comments. The code part had major problems. :) -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html