"Jan H. Schönherr" <[email protected]> writes:
> Am 09.10.2012 21:45, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Jan H. Schönherr <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> +test_expect_failure 'additional command line cc (rfc822)' '
>>> +
>>> + git config --replace-all format.headers "Cc: R E Cipient
>>> <[email protected]>" &&
>>> git format-patch --cc="S. E. Cipient <[email protected]>" --stdout
>>> master..side | sed -e "/^\$/q" >patch5 &&
>>> - grep "^Cc: R. E. Cipient <[email protected]>,\$" patch5 &&
>>> - grep "^ *S. E. Cipient <[email protected]>\$" patch5
>>> + grep "^Cc: R E Cipient <[email protected]>,\$" patch5 &&
>>> + grep "^ *"S. E. Cipient" <[email protected]>\$" patch5
>>
>> Hrm.
>>
>> As we are not in the business of parsing out whatever junk given
>> with --cc or --recipient from the command line or configuration, but
>> are merely parroting them to the output stream, isn't this a
>> user-error in the test that gives --cc='S. E. Cipient <[email protected]>'
>> instead of giving --cc='"S. E. Cipient" <[email protected]>'? Same comment
>> on the new 'expect-failure' tests.
>
> Originally, I just wanted to emphasize, that --to and --cc are
> currently handled differently than in git-send-email, where
> all this quoting/encoding is done.
>
> And it is much more convenient to add
> --cc 'Jan H. Schönherr <...>'
> than
> --cc '=?UTF-8?q?Jan=20H=2E=20Sch=C3=B6nherr?= <...>'
>
> Even more, since I would expect git to correctly handle
> addresses given in a format that is also used elsewhere
> within git.
>
>
> However, I agree that we are not responsible to check/quote/encode
> anything when the user supplies whole headers (though we probably
> could).
>
> But if I cannot convince you, I'll just drop this patch. :)
It wasn't about convincing or not convincing me.
I couldn't read, just from "expect_failure" and "Do some checks
for...", what the intention of the tests and the proposed future
plans were.
If the proposed commit log message (or comments before these
"expect_failure" tests) said something like this:
"git send-email" historically did not parse the user supplied
extra header values (e.g. --cc, --recipient) and just replayed
them, but that forces users to add them in encoded form, e.g.
--cc '=?UTF-8?q?Jan=20H=2E=20Sch=C3=B6nherr?= <...>'
which is inconvenient. We would want to update send-email to
accept human-readable
--cc 'Jan H. Schönherr <...>'
and encode in the future. Add test_expect_failure tests as a
reminder.
that would have avoided such confusion, and even more importantly,
made it easier for us to start discussion on the proposed future
direction. I am personally on the fence.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
