Kirill Smelkov <> writes:

>> > ...
>> > Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <>
>> > Discussed-with: Jeff King <>
>> > ---
>> I do not think I suggested much of this to deserve credit like this,
>> though, as I certainly haven't thought about the pros-and-cons
>> between adding the same "some object in pack may not want to be in
>> the output" logic to the bitmap side, or punting the bitmap codepath
>> when local/keep are involved.
> I understand. Still for me it was you who convinced me to add proper
> support for e.g. --local vs bitmap instead of special-casing it.

OK, in such a case, it probably is more sensible to do it like:

    with all differences strangely showing we are a bit faster now, but
    probably all being within noise.

    Credit for inspiring this solution and discussing the design of
    the change goes to Junio and Jeff King.

    Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <>
     builtin/pack-objects.c  |  36 ++++++++++++-----
     t/ | 103 
     2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Don't forget your own sign-off ;-)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to