On 10 August 2016 at 02:55, Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:28:00PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
>> Some of these problems I hope public-inbox (or something like
>> it) can fix and turn the tide towards email, again.
> This really seems like the dichotomy that drives people towards central
> services like GitHub or GitLab. We need an alternative that doesn't
> involve email, or at the very least, doesn't require people to use email
> directly. Half of the pain in the process comes from coaxing email
> clients that don't treat mail text as sacrosanct to leave it alone and
> not mangle it. (Some of that would go away if we accepted attachments
> with inline disposition, but not all of it. All of it would go away if
> the submission process just involved "git push" to an appropriate
But submission is less important than review. And for review it is
usually better (except gigantic series) to have patch text for review
with the review. And threading. And (meta)-versioning of series.
And place for proof-of-concept / weather-balon patches...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html