> On 10 Aug 2016, at 15:13, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:03:58PM +0200, larsxschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com>
>> The packet_trace() call is not ideal in format_packet() as we would print
>> a trace when a packet is formatted and (potentially) when the packet is
>> actually send. This was no problem up until now because format_packet()
>> was only used by one function. Fix it by moving the trace call into the
>> function that actually sends the packet.
> It looks like there are two functions: packet_write() and
I did not call trace in packet_buf_write() because this function does not
perform any writes.
> Your patch only touches one of them, and it looks like we would fail to
> trace many packets (e.g., see receive-pack.c:report(), which uses
> packet_buf_write() and then write()s out the result).
I see. But isn't it confusing if packet_buf_write() issues a trace call?
If I just call this function then nothing happens at all. Shouldn't the
trace call be made in receive-pack.c:report() ? Or shouldn't receive-pack
let pkt-line.c perform the write calls?
> PS Also, s/send/sent/ in the commit message.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html