From: "Marc Branchaud" <>
On 2016-08-12 03:07 AM, Philip Oakley wrote:
[2nd attempt : ISP troubles]

This has grown like topsy from a little two patch series that tried to
name the 2-dots notation [1] into this extended set of tweaks.

Honestly, I start just trying point out something concrete, like misrendered headers, but then I figure since I'm sending a review comment anyway I might as well go in-depth on the rest of the patch.

I think I'm sticking to substantive comments, but if I'm getting too picky please just swat me down!

No, that's fine. It's important to at least review these points.

I thought I'd picked up all the issues, but it looks like I missed at least one.

The caret thing has a bit of history - see 87c6aeb4efdd43559

It looks like its the two carets on a line mean superscript (Unconstrained quotes) and that maybe the issue.

Then it looks like {caret} does a replacement, though I can't find that in the asciidoc user guide.

I don't quite understand why the ^ symbols work for the Loliger examples, but hey ho, it's good they do...

I'll work on the tweaks, though it'll probably be tomorrow as we have visitors.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to