Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> writes: >> On 30 Jul 2016, at 17:11, Brian Henderson <henderson...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> --- >> contrib/diff-highlight/Makefile | 5 ++ >> contrib/diff-highlight/t/Makefile | 19 +++++++ >> contrib/diff-highlight/t/t9400-diff-highlight.sh | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> contrib/diff-highlight/t/test-diff-highlight.sh | 69 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 156 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 contrib/diff-highlight/Makefile >> create mode 100644 contrib/diff-highlight/t/Makefile >> create mode 100644 contrib/diff-highlight/t/t9400-diff-highlight.sh >> create mode 100644 contrib/diff-highlight/t/test-diff-highlight.sh >> >> diff --git a/contrib/diff-highlight/Makefile >> b/contrib/diff-highlight/Makefile > > Would it make sense to add the contrib tests to the Travis-CI build, too? > https://travis-ci.org/git/git/branches
The more the merrier ;-)? I do not think of a downside, especially if you are adding it as a separate thing that comes after the main test, or for even better isolation, an entirely separate job. By the way, how flaky are existing tests? Are people actively following breakage reports? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
