On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> writes:
>> From: Jacob Keller <jacob.kel...@gmail.com>
>> A future patch is going to add a new submodule diff format which
>> displays an inline diff of the submodule changes. To make this easier,
>> and to ensure that both submodule diff formats use the same initial
>> header, factor out show_submodule_header() function which will print the
>> current submodule header line, and then leave the show_submodule_summary
>> function to lookup and print the submodule log format.
>> This does create one format change in that "(revision walker failed)"
>> will now be displayed on its own line rather than as part of the message
>> because we no longer perform this step directly in the header display
>> flow. However, this is a rare case as most causes of the failure will be
>> due to a missing commit which we already check for and avoid previously.
>> flow. However, this is a rare case and shouldn't impact much.
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.kel...@gmail.com>
> Up to this step it all looked sensible. I'll take a look at 9/9
There is still some outstanding comments from Stefan that I am looking
at, whether to use a die() or not in do_submodule_path.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html