Pranit Bauva <pranit.ba...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Also this version fails to catch "bisect reset a b c" as an error, I
>> suspect.
>
> It didn't when I tried it right now. Could you please elaborate on why
> you think it can fail? There might be a thing which I haven't tested.
My bad. I just compared your bisect_reset() implementation that had
if (no specific commit) {
reset to the branch
} else {
reset to the commit
}
with the original
case $# in
0) reset to the branch ;;
1) reset to the commit ;;
*) give usage and die ;;
esac
and took the difference and reacted "ah, excess parameters are not
diagnosed in this function".
Your caller does complain about excess parameters without giving
usage, and that is what I missed.
I am not sure if you intended to change the behaviour in this case
to avoid giving the usage string; I tend to think it is a good
change, but I didn't see it mentioned in the proposed commit log,
which also contributed to my not noticing the test in the caller.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
