On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:09:44PM +0200, Elia Pinto wrote:

> Hem , sha-3 i suppose, keccak, no ? But really is not so urgent as you
> have already told .

It depends. Read what Schneier wrote right before they announced the
SHA-3 winner:


There's really no security reason not to use SHA-2, and in fact it's
probably better, as it has been more widely studied at this point. But
that part is easy; it's the compatibility switch-over that's hard (we
could also even parameterize the hash, but that has some annoyances,

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to