Jeff King <> writes:

> Hmm, interesting. Your approach seems reasonable, but I have to wonder
> if writing the pid in the first place is sane.
> I started to write up my reasoning in this email, but realized it was
> rapidly becoming the content of a commit message. So here is that
> commit.

Sounds sensible; if this makes Dscho's "which ones failed in the
previous run" simpler, that is even better ;-)

Reply via email to