On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 07:07:11AM -0700, Brian Henderson wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 02:37:46PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Brian Henderson <henderson...@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > How does this look?
> > >
> > > Drawing the graph helped me a lot in figuring out what I was
> > > actually testing. thanks!
> >
> > Yeah, I also am pleased to see the picture of what is being tested
> > in the test script.
> >
> > With your sign-off, they would have been almost perfect ;-).
> doh. fixed.
> I left the subject as v4, probably mostly because I have this weird aversion 
> to
> increasing version numbers :) but I justified it by thinking that the actual
> patch set isn't changing, I just added the sign-off (and updated the commit
> messages per Jeff.) Hope that's ok.

Thanks. Here are a few patches to go on top. The first one could
arguably be squashed into your first patch (and I don't mind if Junio
wants to do so while applying, but I don't think it's worth you

The second one fleshes out the test scripts a bit, now that we have them

And the third fixes a bug that was reported to me off-list. I held back
because it touches the same lines as your topic (and as a bonus, I was
now able to write a test for it). It could be its own topic branch that
graduates separately, but seeing as it's contrib, I don't mind one big
diff-highlight potpourri topic if it makes things simpler.

  [1/3]: diff-highlight: ignore test cruft
  [2/3]: diff-highlight: add multi-byte tests
  [3/3]: diff-highlight: avoid highlighting combined diffs


Reply via email to