On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jakub Narębski <jna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW. perhaps we would be able to continue with 'git continue', regardless
> of what we have started with, I wonder...
git continue as a shorthand for `git <relevant-cmd> --continue` sounds great.
If we were to introduce that, I think we would need to unify the rest
as well then, e.g.
Both revert as well as cherry-pick have --quit as well as --abort,
but rebase doesn't have --quit documented, but instead an additional
--skip and --edit-todo
Would we pull these all up as a top level command? (That sounds not so
great to me)