Adam Spiers <> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Junio C Hamano <> wrote:
>> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <> writes:
>>> +For each pathname given via the command-line or from a file via
>>> +`--stdin`, this command will list the first exclude pattern found (if
>>> +any) which explicitly excludes or includes that pathname.  Note that
>>> +within any given exclude file, later patterns take precedence over
>>> +earlier ones, so any matching pattern which this command outputs may
>>> +not be the one you would immediately expect.
>> "The first exclude pattern" is very misleading, isn't it?
> I don't think so, because of the second sentence.
>> For example, with these in $GIT_DIR/info/exclude, I would get:
>>         $ cat -n .git/info/exclude
>>           1 *~
>>           2 Makefile~
>>         $ git check-ignore -v Makefile~
>>         .git/info/exclude:2:Makefile~   Makefile~
>> which is the correct result (the last one in a single source decides
>> the fate of the path), but it hardly is "first one found" and the
>> matching pattern in the output would not be something unexpected for
>> the users, either.
>> The reason it is "the first one found" is because the implementation
>> arranges the loop in such a way that it can stop early when it finds
>> a match---it simply checks matches from the end of the source.
>> But that is not visible to end-users,
> Correct; that's precisely why I wrote the second sentence which
> explicitly explains this.
>> and they will find the above description just wrong, no?
> It's not wrong AFAICS, but suggestions for rewording this more clearly
> are of course welcome.  Maybe s/immediately/intuitively/ ?

I think this is sufficient:

        For each pathname given via the command-line or from a file
        via `--stdin`, show the pattern from .gitignore (or other
        input files to the exclude mechanism) that decides if the
        pathname is excluded.

and without "Note that" at all.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to