From: "Johannes Schindelin" <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de>
Hi Philip,

On Sun, 4 Sep 2016, Philip Oakley wrote:

From: "Johannes Schindelin" <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de>

> The point is that fixup! messages are really special, and are always
> intended to be squashed into the referenced commit *before* the latter
> hits `master`.

I think it's here that we have the hidden use case. I agree that all fixups
should be squashed before they hit the blessed golden  repository.

I suspect that some use cases have intermediate repositories that
contain a 'master' branch (it's just a name ;-) that isn't blessed and
golden, e.g. at the team review repo level. In such cases it is possible
for a fixup! to be passed up as part of the review, though it's not the
current norm/expectation.

In such a case (which can totally arise when criss-crossing Pull Requests
on GitHub, for example, where a Pull Request's purpose may be to fix up
commits in another Pull Request before the latter is merged), the most
appropriate course of action is... to not reorder the fixup!s prematurely.

We just need to be careful about that plural just there.

If it is multiple fixup!s for the same commit, then I believe they should be grouped together at the same point as the first fixup! commit (in their original order).

If they are for different commits, then they should stay in their place in the commit series (for their first occurrence, then rule 1 applies)


> In short, I am opposed to this change.

It's not like G4W doesn't need fixup!s on the side branches e.g. 5eaffe9
("fixup! Handle new t1501 test case properly with MinGW", 2016-07-12)

I note that you don't have two fixup!s for that commit

Yeah, well, Git for Windows' `master` branch is special, in that it is
constantly rebased (as "merging rebases", to keep fast-forwardability). I
would not necessarily use Git for Windows as a role model in this respect.

I don't see GfW as 'special', rather as being a representative of a broader realpolitik where some of the rugged individualism of open source is moderated in some way or another.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
Philip

Reply via email to