SZEDER Gábor <sze...@ira.uka.de> writes: > I'm not sure about the relevancy of this pararaph, or the relevancy of > the original version for that matter. I mean, there is a different > character for sure, so it's really rather obvious that it can't > possibly be the same suffix in both, isn't it? So I don't think it > adds much value, and don't mind deleting it in the reroll.
Concurred. Let's lose this confusing statement. Thanks.