SZEDER Gábor <> writes:

> I'm not sure about the relevancy of this pararaph, or the relevancy of
> the original version for that matter.  I mean, there is a different
> character for sure, so it's really rather obvious that it can't
> possibly be the same suffix in both, isn't it?  So I don't think it
> adds much value, and don't mind deleting it in the reroll.

Concurred.  Let's lose this confusing statement.


Reply via email to