On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Lars Schneider
<larsxschnei...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Does this convince you to keep the proposed error handling? If yes, then
> I would add a comment to the function to document that behavior explicitly!

oops. I should read the docs more carefully.

Thanks for pointing out.
Then I'd be happy with the patch as is.


Reply via email to