Hi Junio,

On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> > Interactive rebase's scripts may be indented; we need to handle this
> > case, too, now that we prepare the sequencer to process interactive
> > rebases.
> Hmph, have we ever given the sequencer instructions indented to the
> user to edit?


We also never provide the user with an indented todo script in the
sequencer. Yet we still parse it. Because Postel's Law.

> I do not offhand see why we want to be lenient here,
> especially only to the left.

Postel's Law.

We do not care about the right: that's only comments (onelines, for the
users' pleasure).


Reply via email to