Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes:
> So would we rather want to keep the ecbdata around for each file pair and
> just reference that? I thought we deliberately want to avoid ecbdata, so maybe
> we rather want to have another struct that keeps path related information
> around (pointer to the blob and white space information).
I would expect that there would be two structs, one per path
"struct buffered_patch" that has the per-path thing, and another per
line "struct buffered_patch_line" that describes what each line is,
and has a pointer to the former.