On 09/14, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I've queued this trivial SQUASH??? on top, which I think should be > squashed into 3/4.
Yeah, I missed this. The SQUASH??? definitely makes sense, would be great if you could just squash that in. > Thanks. Thanks the reviews and helping me getting the series in a good shape! > > > read-cache.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c > index 2445e30..c2b2e97 100644 > --- a/read-cache.c > +++ b/read-cache.c > @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ int chmod_index_entry(struct index_state *istate, struct > cache_entry *ce, > default: > return -2; > } > - cache_tree_invalidate_path(&the_index, ce->name); > + cache_tree_invalidate_path(istate, ce->name); > ce->ce_flags |= CE_UPDATE_IN_BASE; > istate->cache_changed |= CE_ENTRY_CHANGED; > > -- > 2.10.0-458-g8cce42d > -- Thomas