On 09/14, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I've queued this trivial SQUASH??? on top, which I think should be
> squashed into 3/4.
Yeah, I missed this. The SQUASH??? definitely makes sense, would be
great if you could just squash that in.
Thanks the reviews and helping me getting the series in a good shape!
> read-cache.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
> index 2445e30..c2b2e97 100644
> --- a/read-cache.c
> +++ b/read-cache.c
> @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ int chmod_index_entry(struct index_state *istate, struct
> cache_entry *ce,
> return -2;
> - cache_tree_invalidate_path(&the_index, ce->name);
> + cache_tree_invalidate_path(istate, ce->name);
> ce->ce_flags |= CE_UPDATE_IN_BASE;
> istate->cache_changed |= CE_ENTRY_CHANGED;