On 09/14, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I've queued this trivial SQUASH??? on top, which I think should be
> squashed into 3/4.

Yeah, I missed this.  The SQUASH??? definitely makes sense, would be
great if you could just squash that in.

> Thanks.

Thanks the reviews and helping me getting the series in a good shape!

> 
> 
>  read-cache.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
> index 2445e30..c2b2e97 100644
> --- a/read-cache.c
> +++ b/read-cache.c
> @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ int chmod_index_entry(struct index_state *istate, struct 
> cache_entry *ce,
>       default:
>               return -2;
>       }
> -     cache_tree_invalidate_path(&the_index, ce->name);
> +     cache_tree_invalidate_path(istate, ce->name);
>       ce->ce_flags |= CE_UPDATE_IN_BASE;
>       istate->cache_changed |= CE_ENTRY_CHANGED;
>  
> -- 
> 2.10.0-458-g8cce42d
> 

-- 
Thomas

Reply via email to