Am 21.09.2016 um 23:12 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org> writes:
But I came to a different conclusion as I said in a message that
crossed yours. I hope Thomas can pick up the baton again.
Yeah, our mails crossed, apparently, and I do agree with your
reasoning. How about this, then?
-- >8 --
From: Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 08:18:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] t3700-add: do not check working tree file mode without
A recently introduced test checks the result of 'git status' after
setting the executable bit on a file. This check does not yield the
expected result when the filesystem does not support the executable
What we care about is that a file added with "--chmod=+x" has
executable bit in the index and that "--chmod=+x" (or any other
options for that matter) does not muck with working tree files.
The former is tested by other existing tests, so let's check the
latter more explicitly and only under POSIXPERM prerequisite.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
t/t3700-add.sh | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t3700-add.sh b/t/t3700-add.sh
index 16ab2da..924a266 100755
@@ -361,13 +361,11 @@ test_expect_success 'git add --chmod=[+-]x changes index
with already added file
test_mode_in_index 100644 xfoo3
-test_expect_success 'file status is changed after git add --chmod=+x' '
- echo "AM foo4" >expected &&
+test_expect_success POSIXPERM 'git add --chmod=[+-]x does not change the
working tree' '
echo foo >foo4 &&
git add foo4 &&
git add --chmod=+x foo4 &&
- git status -s foo4 >actual &&
- test_cmp expected actual
+ ! test -x foo4
test_expect_success 'no file status change if no pathspec is given' '
That makes a lot of sense. Thank you so much!