On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 07:45:50PM +0200, Kevin Daudt wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:36:57AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Kevin Daudt <m...@ikke.info> writes:
> > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:30:34PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > >>
> > >> * kd/mailinfo-quoted-string (2016-09-19) 2 commits
> > >> - mailinfo: unescape quoted-pair in header fields
> > >> - t5100-mailinfo: replace common path prefix with variable
> > >
> > > Is this good enough, or do you want me to look into the feedback from
> > > jeff?
> > If you are talking about the simplified loop that deliberately sets
> > a rule that is looser than RFC, yes, I'd like to see you at least
> > consider the pros and cons of his approach, which looked nicer to my
> > brief reading of it.
> > It is perfectly OK by me (it may not be so if you ask Peff) if you
> > decide that your version is better after doing so, though.
> Alright, I'll look into it.
Thanks. I am OK if we do not use my simplified version, but I think
there were some issues I noted with your last version.