Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:

> I left the second one in to make the intention more explicit, and so
> readers did not have to worry that the NULs were overwritten in the
> loop. I'd be OK with it either way, though.

Yes, I agree with that it is a good thing to make our intention more
explicit and I am perfectly fine with leaving it as-is.

Thanks.

Reply via email to