> > We already have options to support these kinds of workflows. Look at the > option '--remote' for 'git submodule update'. > > You then only have to commit the submodule if you do not want to see it > as dirty locally, but you will always get the tip of a remote tracking > branch when updating.
I wonder if we could make that convenient for users by not tracking the submodule, i.e. * we have the information in the .gitmodules file * the path itself is in the .gitignore * no tree entry Then you can update to the remote latest branch, without Git reporting a dirty submodule locally, in fact it reports nothing for the submodule. It sounds like a hack, but maybe it's worth looking into that when people want to see that workflow.
