Vasco Almeida <vascomalme...@sapo.pt> writes:
> } else {
> - print "No untracked files.\n";
> + print __("No untracked files.\n");
> }
Not a big deal, but this makes me wonder if we want to do this
instead
print __("No untracked files.") . "\n";
so that translators do not have to remember to keep the final LF.
It seems there are some more hits of strings that end with "\n"
inside __(...) in this patch, so it probably is OK.
