On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Ramsay Jones
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Hi Duy,
>
> If you need to re-roll your 'nd/worktree-move' branch, could you
> please squash this into the relevant patch [commit c49e92f5c
> ("worktree move: refuse to move worktrees with submodules", 12-11-2016)].
Will do, thanks (and it's also "thanks" for your other similar emails,
I just don't want to send a mail with just 'thanks' that adds nothing
else).
> Also, one of the new tests introduced by commit 31a8f3066 ("worktree move:
> new command", 12-11-2016), fails for me, thus:
>
> $ ./t2028-worktree-move.sh -i -v
> ...
> --- expected 2016-11-15 20:22:50.647241458 +0000
> +++ actual 2016-11-15 20:22:50.647241458 +0000
> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> worktree /home/ramsay/git/t/trash directory.t2028-worktree-move
> -worktree /home/ramsay/git/t/trash directory.t2028-worktree-move/destination
> worktree /home/ramsay/git/t/trash directory.t2028-worktree-move/elsewhere
> +worktree /home/ramsay/git/t/trash directory.t2028-worktree-move/destination
> not ok 12 - move worktree
> #
> # git worktree move source destination &&
> # test_path_is_missing source &&
> # git worktree list --porcelain | grep "^worktree" >actual &&
> # cat <<-EOF >expected &&
> # worktree $TRASH_DIRECTORY
> # worktree $TRASH_DIRECTORY/destination
> # worktree $TRASH_DIRECTORY/elsewhere
> # EOF
> # test_cmp expected actual &&
> # git -C destination log --format=%s >actual2 &&
> # echo init >expected2 &&
> # test_cmp expected2 actual2
> #
> $
>
> Is there an expectation that the submodules will be listed in
> any particular order by 'git worktree list --porcelain' ?
I just sent a patch [1] to fix this before reading this mail. The
order so far has been determined by readdir() which is not great.
[1]
https://public-inbox.org/git/CACsJy8DOT_4N_48UaoYK61G_8JUaXbEs7N=n24CH2q1GN=++5...@mail.gmail.com/T/#mfcf797219a1a143ed2ac45198015f19e82c70db2
--
Duy
