On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> I did review both off and on list and I think the latest version is good. > > I thought that there were strange mixups of two enumeration types > that are incompatible, at least. Is there an update that I didn't > see, or you didn't read problems pointed out on list?
Oh right; there was no resolution to that one IIRC. > >>> * jt/use-trailer-api-in-commands (2016-11-02) 6 commits .. >> From a cursory read (with the SQUASH applied) >> this seems to be done to me. > > We are not all that in a hurry to move non-fix to 'next' only with a > cursory read at this point in the cycle ;-). But the cycle only applies to patches going to master, but when asking for doneness I assumed you were asking for opinions on the transition pu -> next, which I would support. Thanks, Stefan
