Jeff King <[email protected]> writes:
> Here it is in patch form. Perhaps I am missing some subtle case that
> diff-index would not handle, but it does pass the test suite. And
> looking over the original thread, I don't see any particular reason to
> prefer git-diff.
Ah, our mails crossed ;-) I am reasonably sure that "diff HEAD" and
"diff-index HEAD" would behave identically.
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ create_stash () {
> git read-tree --index-output="$TMPindex" -m $i_tree &&
> GIT_INDEX_FILE="$TMPindex" &&
> export GIT_INDEX_FILE &&
> - git diff --name-only -z HEAD -- >"$TMP-stagenames" &&
> + git diff-index --name-only -z HEAD --
> >"$TMP-stagenames" &&
> git update-index -z --add --remove --stdin
> <"$TMP-stagenames" &&
> git write-tree &&
> rm -f "$TMPindex"
Will queue this one instead. Thanks.
