On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> I however offhand do not think the feature can be used to make the
>>> repository shallower
>>
>> I'm pretty sure it can,...
>
> I wrote my message after a short local testing, but it is very
> possible I botched it and reached a wrong conclusion above.
>
> If we can use the command to make it shallower, then the phrase
> "deepen" would probably be what we need to be fixing in this patch:
>
>> OPT_STRING_LIST(0, "shallow-exclude", &option_not, N_("revision"),
>> - N_("deepen history of shallow clone by excluding
>> rev")),
>> + N_("deepen history of shallow clone, excluding rev")),
>
> Perhaps a shorter version of:
>
> Adjust the depth of shallow clone so that commits that are
> decendants of the named rev are made available, while commits
> that are ancestors of the named rev are made beyond reach.
>
> or something like that. Here is my (somewhat botched) attempt:
>
> Adjust shallow clone's history to be cut at the rev
OK mine is "exclude the given tag from local history".
BTW the clone's string could be rephrased better because we know
there's no local history to begin with, if we stick to any verbs that
involves deepening or shortening.
--
Duy
