On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Stephan Beyer <s-be...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/07/2016 09:04 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Stephan Beyer <s-be...@gmx.net> writes: >> >>> [1] By the way: git cherry-pick --quit, git rebase --forget ... >>> different wording for the same thing makes things unintuitive. >> >> It is not too late to STOP "--forget" from getting added to "rebase" >> and give it a better name.
Sorry I didn't know about --quit (and it has been there since 2011, I guess I'm just not big sequencer user). > Oh. ;) I am not sure. I personally think that --forget is a better name Yeah, I was stuck with the name --destroy for many months and was very happy the day I found --forget, which does not imply any destructive side effects and is distinct enough from --abort to not confuse people. > than --quit because when I hear --quit I tend to look into the manual > page first to check if there are weird side effects (and then the manual > page says that it "forgets" ;D). > So I'd rather favor adding --forget to cherry-pick/revert instead... or > this: -- Duy
